Sentencing in Time /
"Exactly how is it we think the ends of justice are accomplished by means of sentencing a convict to a term in prison? How do we relate a quantitative measure of time--months and years--to the objectives of deterring crime, punishing wrongdoers, and accomplishing a quality of justice for those...
I tiakina i:
| Kaituhi matua: | |
|---|---|
| Hōputu: | Tāhiko īPukapuka |
| Reo: | Ingarihi |
| I whakaputaina: |
Amherst, Massachusetts :
Amherst College Press,
[2017]
|
| Rangatū: | Book collections on Project MUSE.
|
| Ngā marau: | |
| Urunga tuihono: | Full text available: |
| Ngā Tūtohu: |
Tāpirihia he Tūtohu
Kāore He Tūtohu, Me noho koe te mea tuatahi ki te tūtohu i tēnei pūkete!
|
Rārangi ihirangi:
- The phenomenological fallacy: out of sight, out of time
- The cosmological fallacy: time is a thing with quantity
- Doing x amount of time for x amount of crime
- Is meaninglessness itself a kind of justified punishment?
- Bad time and good time
- Alternative: "serving" a sentence: sentencing as service
- Objections and responses
- Appendix: Supreme Court decisions of note: In re: Medley ; Ruiz v. Texas (dissent of Justice Breyer) ; Ewing v. California ; Brown v. Plata ; Pepper v. United States ; Miller v. Alabama.