Sentencing in Time /
"Exactly how is it we think the ends of justice are accomplished by means of sentencing a convict to a term in prison? How do we relate a quantitative measure of time--months and years--to the objectives of deterring crime, punishing wrongdoers, and accomplishing a quality of justice for those touch...
Furkejuvvon:
| Váldodahkki: | |
|---|---|
| Materiálatiipa: | Elektrovnnalaš E-girji |
| Giella: | eaŋgalasgiella |
| Almmustuhtton: |
Amherst, Massachusetts :
Amherst College Press,
[2017]
|
| Ráidu: | Book collections on Project MUSE.
|
| Fáttát: | |
| Liŋkkat: | Full text available: |
| Fáddágilkorat: |
Eai fáddágilkorat, Lasit vuosttaš fáddágilkora!
|
Sisdoallologahallan:
- The phenomenological fallacy: out of sight, out of time
- The cosmological fallacy: time is a thing with quantity
- Doing x amount of time for x amount of crime
- Is meaninglessness itself a kind of justified punishment?
- Bad time and good time
- Alternative: "serving" a sentence: sentencing as service
- Objections and responses
- Appendix: Supreme Court decisions of note: In re: Medley ; Ruiz v. Texas (dissent of Justice Breyer) ; Ewing v. California ; Brown v. Plata ; Pepper v. United States ; Miller v. Alabama.