Reaping what you sow a comparative examination of torture reform in the United States, France, Argentina, and Israel /
Furkejuvvon:
| Váldodahkki: | |
|---|---|
| Searvvušdahkki: | |
| Materiálatiipa: | Elektrovnnalaš E-girji |
| Giella: | eaŋgalasgiella |
| Almmustuhtton: |
Santa Barbara, Calif. :
Praeger,
c2012.
|
| Ráidu: | PSI reports (Westport, Conn.)
|
| Fáttát: | |
| Liŋkkat: | An electronic book accessible through the World Wide Web; click to view |
| Fáddágilkorat: |
Lasit fáddágilkoriid
Eai fáddágilkorat, Lasit vuosttaš fáddágilkora!
|
Sisdoallologahallan:
- Torture: the goal of accountability and the world of impunity
- United States: de jure reform with torture lite and rendition
- Israel: soft compliance with judicial oversight of torture-lite
- France: supranational supervision but limited memory battles and accountability
- Argentina: the only case with prosecutions, reparations, and museums
- Spanish inquisition or millennium bombing plot: the value of torture as actionable intelligence, confession, obedience, intimidation, or deterrence?
- The politics of collective memory and torture reform
- Conclusion: two sets of patterns in four states.