Forensics under fire are bad science and dueling experts corrupting criminal justice? /
Збережено в:
Автор: | |
---|---|
Співавтор: | |
Формат: | Електронний ресурс eКнига |
Мова: | Англійська |
Опубліковано: |
New Brunswick, N.J. :
Rutgers University Press,
c2008.
|
Предмети: | |
Онлайн доступ: | An electronic book accessible through the World Wide Web; click to view |
Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
Зміст:
- Forensic pathologists from hell : bungled autopsies, bad calls, and blown cases
- A question of credibility : bad reputations and the politics of death
- The sudden infant death debate Dr. Roy Meadow, Munchausen syndrome by proxy and Meadow's law
- Infants who can't breathe : illness or suffocation?
- Swollen brains and broken bones : disease or infanticide?
- Fingerprint identification : trouble in paradise
- Fingerprints never lie : except in Scotland
- Shoe print identification and foot morphology : the lay witness and the Cinderella analysis
- Bite mark identification : do teeth leave prints?
- Ear-mark identification : emerging science or bad evidence?
- Expert versus expert : the handwriting wars in the Ramsey case
- John Mark Karr : DNA Trumps the graphologists in the Ramsey case
- Hair and fiber identification : the inexact science
- DNA analysis : backlogs, sloppy work, and unqualified people
- Bullet identification : FBI style overselling the science
- The celebrity expert : Dr. Henry Lee.