The arts and state governments at arm's length or arm in arm? /
I tiakina i:
| Kaituhi matua: | |
|---|---|
| Kaituhi rangatōpū: | |
| Ētahi atu kaituhi: | |
| Hōputu: | Tāhiko īPukapuka |
| Reo: | Ingarihi |
| I whakaputaina: |
Santa Monica, CA :
RAND Corporation,
2006.
|
| Ngā marau: | |
| Urunga tuihono: | An electronic book accessible through the World Wide Web; click to view |
| Ngā Tūtohu: |
Kāore He Tūtohu, Me noho koe te mea tuatahi ki te tūtohu i tēnei pūkete!
|
Rārangi ihirangi:
- 1. Introduction
- Research approach
- Report overview
- 2. At arms-length
- SAAS governance structure and decisionmaking processes
- Advocacy
- Insulation or isolation?
- 3. Catalysts for change
- Budgetary trends
- Political developments
- 4. Making the case for the arts in Montana
- Brief history of the Montana Arts Council
- Montana's new strategy : marketing the arts and the agency
- 5. New priorities for public arts funding in Maine
- Brief history of the Maine Arts Commission
- Maine's strategy : strengthening communities, strengthening alliances
- 6. Strategic management of state arts agencies
- Public-value framework
- Lessons from Montana and Maine
- Relevance of lessons to other states
- Arm in arm with state government leaders?
- 7. At arms-length-- but dancing
- Risks of arm-in-arm approaches
- Rewards of arm-in-arm approaches
- Appendix A. Some facts about state arts agencies
- Appendix B. Montana Arts Council's listening tour.