Nonstandard work in developed economies causes and consequences /
I tiakina i:
| Kaituhi rangatōpū: | |
|---|---|
| Ētahi atu kaituhi: | , |
| Hōputu: | Tāhiko īPukapuka |
| Reo: | Ingarihi |
| I whakaputaina: |
Kalamazoo, Mich. :
W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research,
2003.
|
| Ngā marau: | |
| Urunga tuihono: | An electronic book accessible through the World Wide Web; click to view |
| Ngā Tūtohu: |
Tāpirihia he Tūtohu
Kāore He Tūtohu, Me noho koe te mea tuatahi ki te tūtohu i tēnei pūkete!
|
Rārangi ihirangi:
- Introduction
- The change in work arrangements in Denmark and Germany
- Regulatory convergence?
- Nonstandard work in Italy and Spain
- Nonstandard work arrangements in France and the United States
- The growth of nonstandard employment in Japan and the United States
- Employment choices and pay differences between nonstandard and stand work in Britain, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden
- Standard and nonstandard work arrangements, pay difference, and choice of work by Japanese mothers
- Work arrangements among women in the United States
- In search of a new framework for flexibility
- Nonstandard work arrangements in Japan and the United States
- Work attitudes and nonstandard work arrangements in the United States, Japan, and Europe.