Warping Time : How Contending Political Forces Manipulate the Past, Present, and Future /

Warping Time shows how narratives of the past influence what people believe about the present and future state of the world. In Benjamin Ginsberg and Jennifer Bachner’s simple experiments, in which the authors measured the impact of different stories their subjects heard about the past, these “histo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ginsberg, Benjamin (Author), Bachner, Jennifer, 1983- (Author)
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: Ann Arbor, Michigan : University of Michigan Press, 2023.
Series:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Subjects:
Online Access:Full text available:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_111092
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20240815120901.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 230215t20232023miu o 00 0 eng d
020 |a 9780472903344 
020 |z 9780472056002 
020 |z 9780472076000 
035 |a (OCoLC)1370190007 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Ginsberg, Benjamin,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Warping Time :   |b How Contending Political Forces Manipulate the Past, Present, and Future /   |c Benjamin Ginsberg and Jennifer Bachner. 
264 1 |a Ann Arbor, Michigan :  |b University of Michigan Press,  |c 2023. 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2023 
264 4 |c ©2023. 
300 |a 1 online resource:   |b illustrations 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |f Unrestricted online access  |2 star 
520 3 |a Warping Time shows how narratives of the past influence what people believe about the present and future state of the world. In Benjamin Ginsberg and Jennifer Bachner’s simple experiments, in which the authors measured the impact of different stories their subjects heard about the past, these “history lessons” moved contemporary policy preferences by an average of 16 percentage points; forecasts of the future moved contemporary policy preferences by an average of 12 percentage points; the two together moved preferences an average of 21 percentage points. And, in an Orwellian twist, the authors estimate that the “history lessons” had an average “erasure effect” of 8.5 percentage points—the difference between those with long-held preferences and those who did not recall that they previously held other opinions before participating in the experiment. The fact that the past, present, and future are subject to human manipulation suggests that history is not simply the product of impersonal forces, material conditions, or past choices. Humans are the architects of history, not its captives. Political reality is tenuous. Changes in our understanding of the past or future can substantially alter perceptions of and action in the present. Finally, the manipulation of time, especially the relationship between past and future, is a powerful political tool. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
650 0 |a Political science  |y 21st century. 
650 0 |a Forecasting  |x Political aspects. 
650 0 |a Historiography  |x Political aspects. 
650 0 |a Time  |x Political aspects. 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
700 1 |a Bachner, Jennifer,  |d 1983-  |e author. 
710 2 |a Michigan Publishing (University of Michigan),  |e publisher. 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Full text available:   |u https://muse.jhu.edu/book/111092/ 
999 |c 235833  |d 235832