The Pseudo-Democrat's Dilemma : Why Election Monitoring Became an International Norm /

Why did election monitoring become an international norm? Why do "pseudo-democrats" (undemocratic leaders who present themselves as democratic) invite international observers, even when they are likely to be caught manipulating elections? Is election observation an effective tool of democr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hyde, Susan D.
Format: Electronic eBook
Language:English
Published: Ithaca : Cornell University Press, 2011.
Series:Book collections on Project MUSE.
Subjects:
Online Access:Full text available:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000004a 4500
001 musev2_26089
003 MdBmJHUP
005 20240815120734.0
006 m o d
007 cr||||||||nn|n
008 101123s2011 nyu o 00 0 eng d
020 |a 9780801460777 
020 |z 0801460778 
020 |z 9780801456763 
035 |a (OCoLC)742515532 
040 |a MdBmJHUP  |c MdBmJHUP 
100 1 |a Hyde, Susan D. 
245 1 4 |a The Pseudo-Democrat's Dilemma :   |b Why Election Monitoring Became an International Norm /   |c Susan D. Hyde. 
264 1 |a Ithaca :  |b Cornell University Press,  |c 2011. 
264 3 |a Baltimore, Md. :  |b Project MUSE,   |c 2014 
264 4 |c ©2011. 
300 |a 1 online resource (248 pages):   |b illustrations 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
505 0 |a Signaling democracy and the norm of internationally observed elections -- Sovereign leaders and the decision to invite observers -- Democracy-contingent benefits -- Does election monitoring matter? -- The quality of monitoring and strategic manipulation -- Conclusion : constrained leaders and changing international expectations. 
506 0 |a Open Access  |f Unrestricted online access  |2 star 
520 |a Why did election monitoring become an international norm? Why do "pseudo-democrats" (undemocratic leaders who present themselves as democratic) invite international observers, even when they are likely to be caught manipulating elections? Is election observation an effective tool of democracy promotion, or is it simply a way to legitimize electoral autocracies? This book uses cross-national data on election observations since 1960 and case studies of Armenia, Indonesia, Haiti, Peru, Togo, and Zimbabwe to explain international election monitoring with a new theory of international norms 
546 |a In English. 
588 |a Description based on print version record. 
650 7 |a International relations.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00977053 
650 7 |a Elections  |x Corrupt practices.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00904333 
650 7 |a Election monitoring.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00904316 
650 7 |a Democratization.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00890123 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Political Process  |x General.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Political Process  |x Elections.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a POLITICAL SCIENCE  |x Political Process  |v General.  |2 bisacsh 
650 7 |a Political structures: democracy.  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Political structure and processes.  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Politics and government.  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Society and social sciences Society and social sciences.  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a international relations.  |2 aat 
650 6 |a Relations internationales. 
650 6 |a Democratisation. 
650 6 |a Corruption electorale. 
650 6 |a Élections  |x Observation. 
650 0 |a International relations. 
650 0 |a Democratization. 
650 0 |a Elections  |x Corrupt practices. 
650 0 |a Election monitoring. 
655 7 |a Electronic books.   |2 local 
710 2 |a Project Muse.  |e distributor 
830 0 |a Book collections on Project MUSE. 
856 4 0 |z Full text available:   |u https://muse.jhu.edu/book/26089/ 
945 |a Project MUSE - Archive Complete Supplement II 
945 |a Project MUSE - Archive Political Science and Policy Studies Supplement II 
999 |c 231322  |d 231321