The ethics of interrogation professional responsibility in an age of terror /
I tiakina i:
| Kaituhi matua: | |
|---|---|
| Kaituhi rangatōpū: | |
| Hōputu: | Tāhiko īPukapuka |
| Reo: | Ingarihi |
| I whakaputaina: |
Washington, D.C. :
Georgetown University Press,
2013.
|
| Ngā marau: | |
| Urunga tuihono: | An electronic book accessible through the World Wide Web; click to view |
| Ngā Tūtohu: |
Tāpirihia he Tūtohu
Kāore He Tūtohu, Me noho koe te mea tuatahi ki te tūtohu i tēnei pūkete!
|
Rārangi ihirangi:
- If you can't oppose torture, what can you oppose? Psychologists confront coercive interrogations
- What's wrong with supporting national security? psychology and the
- Pursuit of national security
- Interrogating justice: the "torture" memos and the office of legal counsel
- Ticking bombs and dirty hands: coercive interrogation and the rule of law
- Treating terrorists : the conflicting pull of role responsibility
- Discipline and punish : the importance of professional accountability
- Professional responsibility and the virtuous professional
- The day they enter active service : the military conscience
- Lessons learned : dignity and the rule of law
- This we do not do : the future of interrogation and the ethics of professional responsibility.