Reaping what you sow a comparative examination of torture reform in the United States, France, Argentina, and Israel /
I tiakina i:
| Kaituhi matua: | |
|---|---|
| Kaituhi rangatōpū: | |
| Hōputu: | Tāhiko īPukapuka |
| Reo: | Ingarihi |
| I whakaputaina: |
Santa Barbara, Calif. :
Praeger,
c2012.
|
| Rangatū: | PSI reports (Westport, Conn.)
|
| Ngā marau: | |
| Urunga tuihono: | An electronic book accessible through the World Wide Web; click to view |
| Ngā Tūtohu: |
Tāpirihia he Tūtohu
Kāore He Tūtohu, Me noho koe te mea tuatahi ki te tūtohu i tēnei pūkete!
|
Rārangi ihirangi:
- Torture: the goal of accountability and the world of impunity
- United States: de jure reform with torture lite and rendition
- Israel: soft compliance with judicial oversight of torture-lite
- France: supranational supervision but limited memory battles and accountability
- Argentina: the only case with prosecutions, reparations, and museums
- Spanish inquisition or millennium bombing plot: the value of torture as actionable intelligence, confession, obedience, intimidation, or deterrence?
- The politics of collective memory and torture reform
- Conclusion: two sets of patterns in four states.