Judging the Supreme Court : constructions of motives in Bush v. Gore /
I tiakina i:
| Kaituhi matua: | |
|---|---|
| Hōputu: | Tāhiko īPukapuka |
| Reo: | Ingarihi |
| I whakaputaina: |
East Lansing :
Michigan State University Press,
[2007]
|
| Rangatū: | Rhetoric and public affairs series.
|
| Ngā marau: | |
| Urunga tuihono: | An electronic book accessible through the World Wide Web; click to view |
| Ngā Tūtohu: |
Tāpirihia he Tūtohu
Kāore He Tūtohu, Me noho koe te mea tuatahi ki te tūtohu i tēnei pūkete!
|
Rārangi ihirangi:
- Judicial motives in American jurisprudence
- The road to Bush v. Gore
- The United States Supreme Court decides the election
- The dissent reconstructs majority action
- Reporters reconstruct the Supreme Court's action
- Editorialists reconstruct Bush v. Gore
- Scholars reconstruct the stay decision
- Scholars reconstruct how the court reached its decision
- Scholars reconstruct why the court reached its decision
- Scholars reconstruct who decided Bush v. Gore
- Scholars reconstruct when and where the court reached its decision and what it was doing
- Scholars reconstruct Rehnquist's concurring opinion
- Judging the Supreme Court and its judges.